Home Up Jan2004 Feb2004 April2004 Aug 2004 Sept 2004 Oct 2004 Nov 2004 Dec 2004 May2004 June2004 July 2004 March2004

You have reached the Newsletter Archives of the Alpha Omega Society.  To browse through different years, click on button labeled "Up".  To explore our website click on the button labeled "Home".
If you want to search our website for something in particular, click right here to be taken to our search page.

La Femme Silhouette

 September 2004

 

Masthead 2004

Table of Contents

A Few Words from Kathleen

Cookout 2004

Leading Ladies
- A New Play

Monstrous Regiment- A Not So New Book

Zatoichi- A Samurai Film with an interesting Subplot

Curing Transvestism- Comments on a Message Sent to us by an Anonymous Reader

Design's By Victoria- A new and Friendly Shop on the West Side


A Few Words from Kathleen

This letter is addressed, with friendship, specifically to the wives and partners in our group; but also to those who love them. On the day of our cookout, I was experiencing more than a little apprehension about a medical procedure I was about to undergo a few days later. I enjoyed the day, meeting new people and making new friends as well as enjoying time with old friends. Underneath it all, though, was a nagging concern. You see, I had finally broken down and made a doctor’s appointment. My family had been ragging on me forever, especially with the overabundance of thyroid problems we seem to be experiencing.

But what finally put my fingers on the telephone buttons was finding a lump in my breast. Now, this isn’t all that uncommon because I have fibro cystitis, which basically means that I get a lot of lumps, most of which go away all by themselves. Having this disease does not increase the chances of getting cancer, it just makes it harder to detect. So, although I may neglect other routine doctor visits, I faithfully take myself to the doctor each year for my mammogram. My last one had been in November, and, as always, all was fine.

This time, though, I felt a bit apprehensive. It was my first visit to a new family physician. As part of my visit, he read the results of my last test, which showed nothing, but also added that due to dense tissue something could exist which wasn’t visible. He asked me if any other tests had been previously done, such as ultrasound or needle biopsy. No, they hadn’t. He didn’t seem too happy about that. As expected, he ordered another mammogram. What wasn’t expected is that he also ordered an ultrasound, and had his nurse schedule an appointment with a specialist – all before I ever left his office. I did manage to convince him to run the thyroid test, as well. Something I couldn’t get the last doctor to do.

I saw my family physician on Friday, had tests scheduled for Monday and an appointment with the surgeon for follow-up on Friday. By Monday afternoon, the doctor’s office was calling to make sure I had the appointment set up with the surgeon. An hour later they were calling to tell me all my blood work came back A-OK. My thyroid was perfect – just wait till I tell my nagging sister!

My appointment with the surgeon was the afternoon before our cookout. Here was another new doctor I was dealing with, as the one I had been seeing for several years had moved out of state. I immediately felt at ease with this new doctor. When he first came into the room, he said he saw that my family physician was suggesting a needle biopsy. He looked at my mammogram, then my ultrasound, and then said we were ditching the needle biopsy. He felt a surgical procedure to get a frozen tissue sample was in order. The alarms were going off in my head, and the knot in my stomach was getting tighter. He told me there was only a one in seven chance that it would be malignant. He started telling me about what would happen if it did turn out to be malignant. We started talking about lumpectomies and radiation therapy – just in case. When the nurse told him his surgery schedule was booked for the next three weeks, he said they would find a way to fit me in within one week. He didn’t want to wait three weeks. The alarms were sounding even louder, and the knot getting even tighter.

So Martin and I proceeded to the hospital the following Thursday for an outpatient surgical procedure. They told me they would have the results by the time I woke up in the recovery room. They wheeled me into the operating room, and a moment later I woke up in the recovery room. Then came one of those life-changing moments. The doctor approached me, and said, "I’m sorry, it is cancer." The rest of the afternoon was passed in a kind of haze. Thankfully, Martin was there to absorb pieces I didn’t from our discussion with the doctor.

The doctor is emphasizing that we caught it early, it is small, we expect it to be localized, and the cure rate is extremely high. The last stage of knowing for sure is the surgery to remove it and some lymph nodes. Testing the lymph nodes will tell us if it has traveled. Since then has come the ordeal of having to tell family and those who need to know at work. If all goes well, I will be bounce back pretty quickly, and life will get back to normal.

I am telling my little tale as a "heads up" for my female friends. The key to early detection and cure is knowing your own body. Self-examination is important. Don’t ignore a lump. Get to the doctor. If you are told they can’t see anything on a mammogram because of dense tissue, ask about an ultrasound. From my doctor, and from my research I have found that current statistics say that one out of ten women will develop breast cancer at some point in their lives. No one really knows why some women get breast cancer (and rarely a few men). You are more at risk if you never had children, or had your first child after the age of 30. You are more at risk if a close relative has had breast cancer. You are more at risk as you age, and after menopause. But, in the end, it comes down to the luck of the draw. So, friends, go get those check ups. It could save your life.

In friendship, Kathy

Return to Contents

 

[Caring]

Cookout 2004

Martin answers the question - Why?

Recently Kathy and I had our annual cookout at our home. The sky was, for the most part, clear, and the temperature was around 70 degrees. Eight others joined us that day to share the hospitality of our home, six adults and two children. As some of our guests are recent contacts for A-O, I will not use their real names in this article, for the sake of their privacy. Those that I can mention were our dear friends, Joanne, Debbie and Elaine.

One of our new guests had attended an A-O meeting a few years back (about 1998) with his wife. They had been a part of Paradise Club for a few years before that. Since then the wife has had several major medical concerns, so they have not really had contact with a group for about six years. Until that day Kathy and I had only had email and phone contact with them. For the sake of this article, I will refer to them as Sam and Tina.

Tina has been in a nursing home because of her medical conditions for about two years now. Sam has, for the last six years, dedicated himself to Tina’s care and well-being, as well as leading his normal busy life. Even from the contact Kathy and I have had we could tell that there is a great amount of love and respect for each other in Sam and Tina’s marriage.

It was a two-and-a-half hour drive for Sam to attend our cookout, and his cell phone was at the ready in case Tina needed him. Tina had encouraged him to attend the cookout, and we were so glad he did. I hope that, shortly, we can find someone in the group who lives near Sam that can be a personal contact and friend for him. In time, hopefully, Sam can and will be able to attend A-O meetings. Right now, his immediate need is caring friends, and this is true for Tina, as well.

There was also a new couple, who I will refer to as Adam and Cindy, and their two children who came to the cookout. A-O is their first group contact other than Transfamily. It was at a Transfamily meeting that they met Diane Frank, and Cindy has been in contact with Sherry through email since then, as well. Like a lot of couples who are dealing with the questions and concerns of cross dressing in a relationship, they, too, need caring friends and contacts for their support. I hope they, too, find the time to attend our meetings.

Sam, Cindy, and Adam, are in large part the reason that A-O exists, and continues to be needed. Many years ago now, it was a wife that because of her love for her husband started what became A-O. That is our history. That is our legacy. And that is still our purpose as I see it today.

To provide caring, understanding, support, and friendship to all those whose lives are affected by crossdressing is what our group vision and mission is all about, and should be about. I know what it is to be that soul out there, who needs to know that somebody cares. I did not join A-O because it was a time and place to "dress up". I joined A-O because I found friends like Debbie and Elaine, and Tanya, and Barb, and others at the time, who cared that I existed. Their caring helped me to discover myself, as Martin, and for Gloria to discover the person she is.

Because of that caring I found the inner strength to tell my family about Gloria, and I found the miracle that they could love me and Gloria. That caring helped me to find peace in my life that I had never known before, and for Gloria to find life and purpose. The friendships I found in A-O helped me to tell Kathy about Gloria and the group; and that same caring friendship was given to Kathy, just as equally and freely, as it had been to me.

Alpha Omega never has been, to me, a group for cross dressers and spouses. Alpha Omega is a gathering of people, of friends, of equals, and of partners in caring about each other. It was that caring that led Kathy and I to start the cookouts at our home. The cookout was a way for friends in the group to know Martin as a friend as well, and to be a part of the everyday life that Kathy and I share. The cookout was a way to step beyond a meeting and let Kathy and I get to know Dan, and Tom, and John, and Bill, and Marty, and others as their other selves. It also let the gals know the guys as friends.

To me, that was important because if someone was Gloria’s friend, then I wanted them to know Martin as a friend. And I hoped others would share that feeling. The cookout also became a way for gals and guys to come to a first gathering that wasn’t a meeting. For some, that was important, because going to a first meeting can be very scary for them. The cookout was a way to see the friendship, to talk freely, to answer questions, and to calm fears for many.

For Kathy and me it was a way to let our friends know our home was always open to them, and to repay, in a way, the group for the love, caring, and understanding that was given to both of us. One new wife told Gloria at her first meeting, that the cookout had helped her calm her fears about attending her first meeting, because at the cookout she had heard the "guys" talking about doing an oil change on their car one moment and then about buying a new blouse the next moment. It helped her at the first meeting, see beyond the clothes and see the person.

That, too, is part of what AO and our friendships at meetings, and at the cookout and others times in our lives is all about. Getting to know each other for the persons we are, is something wonderful. I hope this year’s cookout was just that experience for those who were able to attend.

It seems that no matter how Kathy and I try to plan ahead, that there are always some friends who are not able to come to the cookout. There are always family or personal reasons that come up, and we understand that. But we do the best we can. We may have been only ten in total for this year’s cookout, but as far as we know everyone had a good time. And that is what all the planning and preparation is all about.

For those who did attend, we are so glad you did. For those who couldn’t attend, know that our friendship, caring, and prayers, are always with you; and that we hope to see you next year at our cookout. Take care now, and Kathy and Gloria will see you all, hopefully, at the September meeting. g

Return to Contents

Leading Ladies

 

A play by Ken Ludwig. Cleveland Play House - world premiere - through October 3rd

 

Reviewed by Diane S. Frank

 

It is not unusual in this community to become a connoisseur of cross-dressed comedies. I've seen "Fanfares of Love" the 1930's German movie on which "Some Like it Hot" was based. I've seen "Some Like it Hot", countless times. Now I've seen Ken Ludwig's "Leading Ladies", a new play that borrows heavily from the character dynamics of those two films. Once again I was struck again by what a really, really, really good film "Some Like it Hot" is and how hard it is for anyone for follow in its high-heeled footsteps. In "Leading Ladies" we're again given two male performing artists, in this case Shakespearian Actors from England, down on their luck, out of cash and looking for their next dime. As their train ambles through Pennsylvania, Jack and Leo (Christopher Duva and Brent Barret) discover that a nearby wealthy and elderly is near death. She is seeking her young relatives- Steve and Max, both of whom were taken away to England at an early age and have never been heard from since. Leo proposes that they impersonate Steve and Max to win the unclaimed fortune. We in the audience know that Steve and Max are really girls, so there is a little suspense built up wondering how the actors will find out that Steve is Stephanie, Max is Maxine, and that they'll have to wear skirts to commit their impersonations.

 

Just like the two films, one character (Leo/Maxine) is the operator, pushing and manipulating his unwilling partner into the scheme. Many of the key elements of the films are brought out one after the other, most especially, getting out of skirts in order to woo and win the available women. There is even a reverential quote from "Some Like it Hot", where complaining about dancing in heels, Stephanie (Jack) exclaims "It's a whole 'nother sex!". I said a little prayer of thanksgiving that the very stale sight gag of men wobbling in heels was not trotted out, and that both actors moved well in their fully-petticoated flared-skirted 1950's costumes.

 

And how did they look you are asking? Unfortunately, the press kit I was provided with did not feature any pictures of the cast in costume. Christopher Duva, the smaller of the two male leads, actually made a fetching Stephanie when fully attired in a 50's dress in the second act. There were moments when he was allowed to act in a more natural fashion, not mugging and playing to the house, and not in over-the-top caricature, where you could even see Stephanie as a real side of Jack. Barret was unnecessarily costumed to have more beard shadow after appearing in a dress than before and was forever playing the Diva. I found Barret's Maxine tiresome, and found the personal interest in him expressed by Meg (Erin Dilly) unconvincing. It's perhaps not fair to compare Barret’s character to Tony Curtis' loveable rascal of a saxophone player, but I believed it when Sugar (Marilyn Monroe) declared her fatal attraction to yet another saxophone player, and I didn't believe it when stage-struck Meg did. What was believable was the sense of liberation that Maxine represented compared to Meg’s planned marriage to her stuffy, anal, fortune-hunting Minister (ably played by Mark Jacoby).

 

The actors in this play are all seasoned veterans, and even with opening night jitters, the performances were of high quality, except for Barret whose delivery was too frequently rushed and unclear. The supporting player's parts were in many ways more interesting than the leads, whose roles seem inevitably bound to the pattern of show's cinematic predecessors. Just as the Chicago Moll, Norma, King Marchand's soon to be ex-girlfriend, steals the show in "Victor/Victoria", Florence (Jane Connell), the dying woman stole the show here. Every hint of a word or entrance from her was moment of joyful anticipation. The earthy country doctor, played with brio by Dan Lauria (from the Wonder Years!) was nicely set against Florence, his patient. In some ways, the bickering between the two was fresher and funnier and more organic than most other bits in the show. The local girl Audrey, Jack's love interest, was another wonderful over-the-top part with lots of room for Lacey Kohl's playful characterization.

 

According to most critics of cross-dressed bedroom farces, there is generally a message stuck in somewhere. Usually, it works along the line that walking a few miles in the other sex's shoes leaves one a better person. Dustin Hoffman's "Tootsie" stuck with this moral closely. "Some Like It Hot" added the daring ideas that being courted, being wooed by a wealthy, playful attentive lover is something that anyone could get used to. Osgood's closing line, "Nobody's perfect" has that perfect risqué edge for its time in suggesting that love is where you find it even if your intended bride turns out to be a man. "Leading Ladies" may well have had a message for our crowd. At the end it is clear that her supposed heirs didn’t fool the sharp-eyed and acid-tongued Florence for a minute, but she likes them anyway. And for us, I think that's a wonderful take home message. You don't have to fool people to gain acceptance, you have to be likeable, just like any other time.

 

So go. Go see it now, while you've got first rate actors and a wonderful set and well executed costumes. Because the show uses a limited cast, a simple if elegant set and no fancy lighting, it will become a low budget staple of community theatre all too soon, where you might not get those things. Go. You'll have a good time. The Cleveland Playhouse does have unisex, single occupancy handicapped access bathrooms for those who wish to practice discretion on that issue. The crowd there prides itself on its sophistication and will simply pat itself on the back for being knowing and tolerant if they notice you at all. Go, get out there and be likeable!

 

 


Return to Contents

 

 

Monstrous Regiment

 

A book by Terry Pratchett, HarperCollins 2003

 

Review by Diane S Frank

 

"To promote a woman to bear rule, superiority, dominion or empire above any realm, nation, or city is repugnant to nature, contumely to God, and the subversion of good order, of all equity and justice."

 

John Knox -The First Blast of the Trumpet Against the Monstrous Regiment of Women.- 1558

 

Regiment of Women by Thomas Berger was a satirical largely anti-feminist somewhat science fiction book from the 1970’s that depicted a dystopia where men and women totally changed social places and costume. Monstrous Regiment, another Discworld story by Terry Pratchett on the other hand finds not only a regiment but a whole army infiltrated by crossdressed women. And while Pratchett follows his general genial satirical mode, his women are heroes. They save the day, rescue their little country and overturn worship of a demented god. They do so at peril of actually becoming "men" in the sense of losing themselves in the masculine military world, whereas they supposedly have better sense about some things as women. But Pratchett does hold to the general literary and cultural expectation that women crossdress for serious reasons, like economic, social and political opportunity, while men do it for essentially silly reasons. (See the article, Men in Skirts posted in the webmistress selects section, as well as the large section on female to male crossdressing.)

 

The two identifiably crossdressed men are as expected figures of fun. In one scene, a male captain in a dress manages to infiltrate an enemy held castle by using the theatrical skills gained in an all-boys school to impersonate a washer woman. (Shades of Toad escaping from prison disguised as washer woman in Wind in the Willows). Later his female-impersonating-male soldiers don dresses in an attempt to rescue him. They have been impersonating an uncouth idea of male soldiers for so long that their mannerisms remain when they are back in skirts. As they attempt to get the gate, they are instantly "recognized" as men-in-dresses, until one of them (pregnant) lifts her skirts, and another one collapses in tears.

 

Succeeding as social satire, a parable on the sexes, and as just good fun, "Monstrous Regiment" should be added to your reading list.

Return to Contents

 


Zatoichi

 

A Takeshi Kitano Film (2003), Cedar Lee Theater in Cleveland Heights

Review by Diane S. Frank

I know, I know all human beings are the same. But having been to China via Japan Airlines and watching the entertainment package, stopping in Tokyo overnight and seeing what's in the overnight hotel convenience store offered, I'm convinced that Japanese Culture is truly different. At this point everyone must know of Anime, the highly stylized comic form used for Dragon Ball Z, Pokemon and other favorites with the kids. There's also Manga, illustrated books, often with highly explicit sexual themes. What I've read suggests that respectable Japanese businessmen will read this sort of thing in public on the train or subway. Imagine people reading Playboy or Penthouse in public in the US! Prowling the newsstand at the hotel I found a couple of examples of manga. Browsing through one I found an story of sexual adventure featuring a boy lusting after a popular entertainer who insisted he put on her bra and dance around. I couldn't figure out much more than that, but apparently he had a good time until her manager showed up.

All this is prelude to seeing Kitano's remake of the Japanese Samurai legend of the blind swordsman Zatoichi. This particular incarnation featured a strong transgender sub-plot. Most reviewers regard that story as crossdressing, but the film is far closer to the attitude of the Chinese art film "Farewell My Concubine", than say "Some Like it Hot". The basic concept of the legend is that a virtuoso but elderly and blind Samuri wanders through the countryside avenging wrongs committed by criminal gangs against the common people. Prior to the action of this story, a gang wipes out all but the son and daughter of a prosperous rice merchant. You meet these children grown up, both posing as Geishas in order to survive and seek revenge for the murder of their parents. But this is no mere crossdressing. As told in a flashback, you see the children escape by luck, the girl waking the boy up to go see their pet rat that was kept under the house. The boy's hair is styled much like his sisters even then and I think that there is an implication that the boy is far closer to his sister than usual for a boy.

for their lives, they are taken into a household only to discover that the owner of the house is a pederast who finds the boy quite attractive. As seen in the flashback, the boy isn't altogether reluctant to accept the attentions of the man. The man has painted the boy's face, and dressed him in a kimono. The sister rescues him, but as they sit at a rural shrine hungry and with nowhere to go, the boy, still in kimono and painted face approaches a man wandering by and prostitutes himself so they can survive. The children then train themselves to become a pair of geishas and wander the area robbing unsuspecting customers and seeking their parent's murderers. All works out in the end, as the blind swordsman rids the town of the criminal gang and avenges the siblings.

In an anti-climactic scene, one of the side-kicks says to the boy that now he can go back to being a man. The boy declines, saying he prefers it this way. This treatment has a strong parallel to the tale of two Chinese Opera stars across several tumultuous decades of Chinese history in "Farwell my Concubine". Here a 

boy forced, beaten into playing women's parts in the Opera, raped by one patron, and seduced by another comes to embrace his fate. In the end he causes his own death out of frustrated and unrequited love for his totally heterosexual and perhaps oblivious best friend and co-star. In both cases there are scattered clues that indicate that fate and the basic nature of the boys conspired to bring about the drama. This wasn't choice but coincidence based on the intrinsic nature of the boys.

I marvel at these stories, with their transgender elements and their homosexual elements simply because the characters in each are treated with dignity and respect. These are not caricatures. Their lives may be tragedies, fated by Gods, but they are human tragedies, not sexualized parodies. I'm hard pressed to think of any big budget American film that treats gender crossing with such care and decency, as drama, not travesty g

Return to Contents

If you’re not already a Terry Pratchett fan, Monstrous Regiment is a good introduction to his Discworld series. Discworld, the set for Pratchett’s brand of comedy of manners is really flat and circular, with the seas falling off the edges. This world is supported on the back of 4 huge elephants, which are in turn standing on the back of an even larger turtle that swims through space, going slowly somewhere. With some 30 titles already in this series, there is something to amuse everyone, whether it’s earthy feminist witches, growley police Inspectors following the Scotland Yard motif and with vampires, werewolfs, dwarves, trolls, golems, "Igors" or inept wizards. - Diane

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Can you guess who is brother and who is sister?

 

 

 

 

 

 

A Cure for Transvestism?

 

Diane S. Frank comments on an anonymous remark left on our website’s contact form.

We recently received the following remark:

"I believe that the reason I started having Transvestic inclinations was my mother threatened me with castration at the age of 4. I have found that Buddhist meditation has helped me to largely eliminate tranvestism in myself though I still have powerful urges at times to try on some shoes. I am now at a stage where the inclinations to dress up are on the wane. I think this information should be shared as there is apparently no good cure for transvestism. There are many like me who have been able to deal with this issue. This information should be shared. Buddhist meditation is only for some and should ideally be done with a teacher".

I wish the person writing this had left contact information so we could engage in some sort of dialogue. I've already shared these remarks and solicited comments from an on-line discussion group to round out my thinking on the matter. From my own perspective I think we need to be careful of what we mean when we use the word "cure". To me, a cure for something means that the something doesn't shadow your life, that you don't have to exercise vigilance against its possible return. A cure for something is different from managing something.

ne correspondent pointed out that in the Christian tradition, we are all subject to earthly temptation to do things we ought not to do. We are accordingly not expected to eliminate temptation, only not to succumb to it. The Buddhist tradition is to gain detachment from desire, so will desire or temptation may still be present it does not rule one's life. In these contexts a cure is equivalent to management. One can say homosexuality is cured, not by the absence of desire for sex with men and the replacement of that desire with a desire for sex with women, but by the elimination of sexual contact with men. One could say that crossdressing is cured by eliminating the behavior. Of course, if you isolated a homosexual from men, or a crossdresser from any women's clothing, making the acts impossible you could also claim a cure. I don't agree. Merely controlling what one does about desire doesn't cure one of it, even if controlling is the wise and responsible thing to do.

I have no idea whether our unknown correspondent saw any potential in his own life for crossdressing to be a positive meaningful addition to it. If it was just a burden, I'm glad he's found a way to set it down. Reading the post, I'm not quite sure the person really has set it down. How do we now that this person isn't on the downside of a normal cycle? Why is there still a powerful urge to try on shoes? And if the person has detached crossdressing from his being, why seek out and contact a group like ours unless the topic was still greatly on his mind? Couldn't focus on ideas about crossdressing simply be a substitute for the act itself?

One of our group was deeply into Buddhist practice and spent years on an Ashram. In this person's case deep meditation and guidance of a teacher was of no help. I meditate regularly, but I've never tried (or wanted to try) deliberately using meditation to change something. The tradition of my mediation isn't objective focused.

I have written elsewhere, if perhaps not as visibly, that I have never liked the widely held notion that crossdressing isn't curable, by which most people mean manageable. I take the general meaning to be in the context that we read of cycles of purging and re-acquiring clothing. The attempted cure has failed here, although I would say the attempt at management has failed. I am greatly bothered by the idea that we can manage and control alcoholism, and drug-addiction but somehow crossdressing is beyond that. I want people who crossdress to do so because it adds something positive and meaningful to their lives, not because they are unable to stop despite the harm it could cause them and their families. I want management techniques that work, whether they are Buddhist mediation or Christian prayer and counseling or psychotherapy or anti-depressants. I want equal validity for people's choices to crossdress or not to crossdress, and I want people to be happy in their choices.

What do you think?

Return to Contents

 

Designs by Victoria

A friendly, secure shop specializing in lingerie and larger sized women's clothing on the West Side. Owned by Shawn Renell Jackson, the store also carries several lines of skin care, bath and body products. Ms. Jackson is a gracious and personable woman who was made it clear that AO members and other are equally welcome to shop in her store. The following notes are worth remembering:

 

Don’t break an appointment. Show Shawn that she can trust members of our community.

Changing rooms are available.

Don’t wear heavy perfume that might stick to clothing you try on.

Bring a towel or large handkerchief to put over your face when trying on pull-over garments. This is prevent makeup from getting on them.

Have a half-slip and a full slip along so that skirts and dress’s hang properly.

Wear proper undergarments when trying on clothing.

Shawn will also provide confidential ordering services and will process credit card purchases in a way that doesn't cause the items to be listed on billing.

We look forward to having Shawn as a guest speaker in the near future. – Diane S. Frank

Return to Contents

  

DESIGNS BY VICTORIA

5712 Detroit Avenue

Cleveland, Ohio 44102

(216) 281-0359

Hours:

Mon-Thur 10A-6:30P

Fri-Sat 9A-8P

 

 

Upcoming Meetings

We're still working out the details for October

 

Return to Contents

 

 

 

Publication Notice and Club Policies

 

This newsletter is copyright 1998-2004 by The Alpha Omega Society. All rights reserved. Articles and information contained in this newsletter may NOT be without advance permission from the individual author. Write to editor@aosoc.org in order to contact the author. When permission is granted, a copy of the issue containing the reprinted material must be sent to Alpha Omega within two months after the material is published and proper credit is given to author and source.

The opinions or statements contained in this newsletter are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of Alpha Omega. Contributions of articles are welcomed, but may be altered in the editing process, with the author’s intent retained, or may be rejected, whether solicited or not. Absolutely no sexually explicit material may be accepted or printed.

Alpha Omega is a non-profit social support group for heterosexual crossdressers and their wives or partners. Also, members from related organizations, helping professionals, and approved guests are welcome when cleared through Alpha Omega’s officers.

Meetings are the second Saturday evening of each month unless a special event is scheduled that takes the place of the regularly scheduled meeting. The location of the meeting or event is only released to members or others with the approval of an officer. Members and visitors must be 18 years of age or older. We will exchange newsletters with any other similar group. Send all correspondence to Alpha Omega, P.O. Box 2053, Sheffield Lake, OH 44054.

Return to Contents